OSSHunt

Checked 2026-10-21

Pingdom vs Uptime Kuma

Fit:

Migration notes

HTTP/TCP/DNS/push checks, alert delivery and status pages. Operate your own external vantage points; no claim of Pingdom transaction or real-user-monitoring parity or check import.

Sources: github.com, www.pingdom.com · checked 2026-10-21

PingdomPaid incumbent

Entry priceNot established
Pricing modelmixed, billed annual
OwnerSolar Winds Corporation, privately held by Turn/River Capital

Official pricing calculator returned currency placeholders without numeric price; amount unverified. Source

Pingdom plans reviewed
Synthetic MonitoringentryNot established
Synthetic Monitoring + Real User MonitoringbusinessNot established
EnterpriseenterpriseQuote only

Uptime KumaOpen-source alternative

Fit for Pingdom
License
Paid-feature tier A
Self-host
Paid-feature limitsNone established
Uptime Kuma plans reviewed
Uptime Kumafree self-hosted coreFree

What you may give up

No paid-feature limits established for this edition.

Tier A: MIT project; upstream README publishes self-hosted monitoring, notifications, and status pages without commercial edition or feature tiers. No first-party paid hosting identified. License source

What running it takes

Hover or focus an icon for its name. Dashed means not established; struck through means no; grouped icons are alternatives.

Version 2 route supports SQLite and Maria DB; no compulsory Redis or separate queue identified. Database checks being monitored are targets, not backend prerequisites. Infrastructure and staff time are not priced here; this page does not compare total cost.